Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    30
  • comments
    126
  • views
    1,839

Questionable Morality

Sign in to follow this  
socolais

1,748 views

Perhaps, with the current Proposition 8 controversy in California, it's a good time for morality discussions within the swinger community.

 

While many vanillas would question our entire value systems, we have seen the true light and cast off the shackles of the strict sexual exclusivity burden. We understand the noble value of sharing sexuality with each other. Our community has no regulatory or enforcement authority. We are each acting as free agents in a permissive environment. We do as we choose, tempered by our internal moral compass and our acceptance by our peers. If we are rejected by the community, our pool of potential playmates is diminished. Honor among thieves.

 

Welcome to the virtual trailer park of the morality domain. You can check in, but you can't check out. We have rules here and we're not going list them for you. Put your double-wide load in lot 69 and join us by the pool when the sun goes down. [Damn, I love a good metaphor.] Some of us will help you reassemble your "redwood" deck and make sure you're hooked-up properly, but there's a few of us you'd better watch out for....

 

Maybe, there's no virtual community at all. There are way too many variations on "sexual perversity". We're not JUST a community of swingers, we're part of that bigger group of folks who generally choose sexual options without regard for the historical influence of the Catholic church. Also known as sexual deviants. The swingers observe one set of rules and the BDSM crowd uses another but most vanilla folks can't see the difference. Convicted sex offenders are in this group too.

 

I wonder how well the active participants of The Swingers Board represent the general community of swinging couples, especially in the North American continent. From my limited observations, the general consensus of the active members on the board is remarkably consistent with what we've seen here in the DFW area.

 

Rules of the community tend to be based on historical mistakes. We know a particular behavior should be discouraged because smarter folks than us have tried and failed. All rules must be compatible with the Golden Rule. A collective wisdom develops when we communicate our successes and failures. We can better enjoy our sexual adventures when we avoid well known detractors. I think it's interesting that long-standing rules must be periodically refreshed with the blood of Ignorance and Obstinance. Some rules may become obsolete - like, "use an easily recognizable wad of keys at the party".

 

We have rules for interacting with vanillas, and rules about disclosing our medical status. We have rules about what should not be discussed at sex parties.

 

Ahhhhhh,, Can I have another Rule Book? My dog ate the first one

 

Sweet iced tea and cookies at the pool party, if ya want something stronger, bring it

Sign in to follow this  


11 Comments


Recommended Comments

Do you know how many times when I hear your thoughts, if we were sittin in lawn chairs next to the pool, I would take a sip of what ever I was drinking, lean your way and say "man, we got it made"

 

fun

Share this comment


Link to comment

Man, we definitely got it made!!! This is the best trailer park this side of the Mississippi. And Sweet, I'll bet that's some scrumptious T

Share this comment


Link to comment
From my limited observations, the general consensus of the active members on the board is remarkably consistent with what we've seen here in the DFW area.

 

Seems also to match those which are evident in southwestern Pennsylvania as well.

 

Rules of the community tend to be based on historical mistakes. We know a particular behavior should be discouraged because smarter folks than us have tried and failed. All rules must be compatible with the Golden Rule. A collective wisdom develops when we communicate our successes and failures. We can better enjoy our sexual adventures when we avoid well known detractors. I think it's interesting that long-standing rules must be periodically refreshed with the blood of Ignorance and Obstinance. Some rules may become obsolete - like, "use an easily recognizable wad of keys at the party".

 

Even those who create drama can eventually return to the collective grace of the "community".

Share this comment


Link to comment

Thanks for the confirming data point. I truly believe The Swingers Board is a reliable barometer of the general state of swinging - especially in the U.S.

 

I think regaining favor of the group after rejection is not impossible, just an up-hill battle (once bitten, twice cautious). That goes well with the "shining metaphor" of the trailer park - if we're not comfortable with our neighbors, it's fairly easy to relocate (avoid THAT clique).

 

Good ole Jack, "You want the truth?! You can't HANDLE the truth!!"

Share this comment


Link to comment

We quote:I truly believe The Swingers Board is a reliable barometer of the general state of swinging - especially in the U.S.

 

==========================

We are newer members of the Board and concur completely.

Thanks for and interesting read.

Share this comment


Link to comment

One of the reasons I was questioning the correlation between the consensus of the board and successful domestic swingers is that I suspect The Board has "some" influence on the general population of swingers - especially the novices and wannabes. I believe this is the largest and most mature discussion forum concerning responsible non-monogamy. The volume of dialog becomes an easy target for google searches in pursuit of answers sexual. Julie is the gorilla of her domain (aint that a sexy thought).

 

I read the threads in the forum or at least the subject line and I think it is very interesting that we've become shade-tree marriage counselors. Complete strangers spill their guts about their most intimate relationship troubles. They observe that we must have some answers because we've already gone beyond the relationship hurdles they are having difficulty with. It is interesting to watch the reaction of the poster when the advice given is not what they were hoping for. So many of them seem to want a "moral license" to go out and have sex with whomever they may choose without regard for undesirable consequences. It's almost as if they're looking for some kind of justifiable loophole in the morality code that permits them to find some nontraditional path to their sexual fulfillment - without the "work" of fixing their current troubles. Others, see the wisdom in the guidance and their relationship benefits from the ideas we share with them - either in the form of direct dialog or through the outstanding archive of relevant threads.

 

I believe some guests understand the logic we describe and use their newfound knowledge to adjust their perspective and perhaps their internal moral compass in a way they are likely to find a slightly more rewarding existence through a balanced and compassionate sexual interaction with others. So yes, I think the board is a positive influence on general sexual morality and also, relationship maturity.

 

Altruistic compassion for others, is a fundamental building block of most morality codes. I think we practice what we preach.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...