Leaderboard

As the husband of a gorgeous size 4 hottie I can say with great confidence that if someone dumped us because she was too good looking we would both be very hurt and we would think you were a pair of insecure, superficial imbiciles. We can accept if someone rejects us because they are not attracted to us or we do not meet their preferences or have done something that pisses them off but to be blown off because one of us is too good looking is not only silly it is insulting. By allowing your insecurities to get the best of you if you reject these people you are not only accusing them of being superficial and petty and judgemental but you are being the same thing that you are assuming they are. If you reject them due to appearances then you are the one being shallow and vain, not them. Pretty much every female we have ever played with has been less attractive than my wife and she has never once been "grossed out" or felt the least bit sorry for me. That is a completely ridiculous thing to say. Just because someone is attractive does not mean that they are shallow or vain or mean spirited towards those of different body types. Attractive people are capable of carrying on an inteligent conversation and are capable of being kind and compassionate and enjoy the company of others for a wide variety of reasons and interests. Not every beautiful women is a souless, egotistical bimbo like Paris Hilton or Britney Spears.

Not at all. I actually wish we had a lot more reviews. I think part of the problem has been the several changes we have gone through in the review process on this site. In the process of those changes many reviews have gotten lost or removed (I don't see a lot of reason in keeping many old reviews). The way reviews were originally posted was that they were emailed to me and I posted them. This led to a lot of issues as quite often what we dealt with were competing clubs posting negative reviews of each other and positve reviews of themselves (using different email addresses). It was very hard to track manually. So I had a system designed to help out with that issue, which required users to register to post reviews. This made sure that each post was from a different registered user (which we can track via email and IP address) to do away with the previous issue of club hosts/owners posting reviews. Some clubs didn't like that and have found that the easiest way around something is that if they have a review they don't like they remove their club listing altogether and start over. The latest board upgrade last fall forced us to completely change the system yet again. I don't care for the new system as much as I did the one I had designed but we take what we can get. I think the new layout for the club listings & reviews has cut down on the number of reviews that we have posted overall. Another issue that affects the reviews now is that they are no longer anonymous, therefore some people are hesitant to post negative reviews of a club or to be completely honest becuase they are scared that someone might confront them on it. There are a lot of issues at play in regards to the club reviews, in the end, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. Back to the original question at hand. I'm sure there are some clubs out there that have hidden cameras just like I know there are some clubs out there that are run by scum who think that just because they are the hosts they get first dibs at every couple who walks in the door. But, I don't think that is a majority by any means. Is it a question you should ask yourself when looking at a new club? yes. In the end, I think that those who have cameras may use the excuse you posted as an EXCUSE... but most likely their real reason is that it gives the scummy host something to jerk off to after hours.

That is total nonsense if you have a trouble maker you don't have to "have" something on them just throw them out.

First off Welcome to the board. And to answer your question on why you can't post to the forums at the bottom of the list, those are Archive forums. They are where old threads go when they have lived their life but we feel that their information will still be useful to others (it makes it easier for them to find it later). With the active forums we like to keep things a little bit simpler, rather than expecting people to find just exactly the RIGHT forum to post their question in. To answer your actual question. I do understand where you are coming from and I think that all of us women go through that insecurity at times, not necessarily with the same questions, but wondering "why would they want to be with me?" or thinking "they are too hot to want to be with me". As has been pointed out those insecurities belong to us and when it comes down to it if someone has expressed and interest in us, then get over it, they are interested. Might they change their mind when they meet you? Maybe, but does that mean it has anything to do with your size or looks? Doubtful, unless your photos are a terrible misrepresentation of who you are, or unless you meet them wearing a girdle and full set of Spanx.

I was told that the Clubs take hidden video, just for assurance to "have" something on would be trouble makers.

I'm with Billie and Elaine on this.I have valid reasons. Church is not a valid institute. It is rather an institute of control. The only reason for the existence of religion (of ANY kind) is to divide and conquer, to cause enmity , racial hatred and discord. This statement is self evident and can be seen by merely looking at the current world condition. The most glaring 2 examples are Muslim extremism and it's brother, christian extremism of which g.w. bush is a proponent. He did say he was chosen by god, didn't he? We have to look at the facts here. It is FACT that there was no Jesus Christ. There is rather a higher awareness and a need to be responsible toward one-another which transcends that which is thrown at us from pulpits around the planet. Religion, politics and war should all be outlawed.....immediately.

Most Americans believe that the ‘Bible’ was written in English and later translated into various “Other” dialects , (We are not addressing that stupidity problem)