Leaderboard

Here's the perfect example: New American Standard Bible Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, King James Bible Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, King James 2000 Bible Know you not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, American Standard Version Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men, English Revised Version Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men, Webster's Bible Translation Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Young's Literal Translation have ye not known that the unrighteous the reign of God shall not inherit? be not led astray; neither whoremongers, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor sodomites, Pick your translation. While about half actually say homosexuals or men lying down or having sexual relations with males, there are still plenty of translations (including the King James version) that don't say that. Also, it's only men and not women? Anyways, looking forward to reading the new story.

I posted my first story and will the second. I showed her the second, and she said that she didn't like the language and that it lacked some romantic feeling. The content, though, she had no objection to! She challenged me to write another story, but with nicer language and with the romantic vibe she suggested. Challenge accepted! As far as the homosexual issue, I read in 1co6:9 homosexual people (in many versions male) won't inherit the kingdom of God. Im not sure what that means but im sure it will be revealed in time. I'm reading Divine Sex (mentioned in an above post) and am finding it very interesting. I'm putting in a lot of thoughts in the margin so that when I ask my wife to read it, she'll see that I've given the book a lot of careful thought. Also, I asked her not to judge me or reject me for my desires or my thoughts and she agreed without reservation. I know she loves me, and she says that she doesn't share very well with others. Anyway, onward and upward...

I don't understand why it is so difficult to produce a good show about sex, the mainstream templates are so obvious. You send four couples to an exotic location to work on something in their sexual relationship than has been ailing them. With the help of the other couples and the therapists/counselors at the location they improve communication and expand their sexual boundaries to a degree and at a pace the couple is comfortable with. Sexual Fantasy Island, you'd use most of the money licensing Marvin Gaye's "Sexual Healing" for the theme. If anyone from Playboy Channel is reading you can PM me for where to send my check.

While everyone knows how I go on and on about needing love/trust/communication to be successful in swinging, the truth of the matter is that you need all three to be successful in ANY relationship. That a huge number of couples don't have the trust and communication to be able to talk about past 'experience' or are unwilling to even listen to the suggestion (even if only as a fantasy) of a threesome or swinging is why so many relationships fail these days. I especially love it when one partner says that they are going to punish the other partner for THINKING about something (...but now I'm married and he better not even bring up the topic or I'll kill him). Just because you threaten your partner, isn't going to stop them from thinking about it and it only starts you down a road that ends in a dead end.

Two seemingly disparate questions. Both get to the notion of partnership. Partners keep the line of communication open, no matter how hurtful it might seem. Going to bed mad with the communication line open usually results in "It hurts when you won't hold me." "Maybe you should hurt--you hurt me." "Can we break the cycle of hurting each other?" After a few turns of conversation, one or the other says what they're really angry about and the issue is addressed if not resolved. The only exception is when one or both parties is too tired to have a rational conversation. Communication also includes disclosures of wants and needs. "I want to have sex with someone besides you" might sound like a horrible thing to say--but it's a lot better than not disclosing that want and cheating. The quest for sexual alternatives--if not variety--is biologically hard-wired, and it makes a lot more sense to get those fantasies out on the table. Once exposed, they are a lot less threatening. And in a partnership, it's fun to fulfill the other's fantasies. Not every day, but enough.