Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/29/2019 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    Words mean things. Often in a "gang"bang you get exactly that, gang behavior on the part of the men. Human beings recognize relative safety in numbers and also non-accountability in a group activity, that's how riots happen along with other forms of aberrant behavior. What the OP described is illustrative of the point. Mrs Doc has enjoyed multiple partners (3,4,5)on occasion but none of the men were random guys picked off a website. They were respectful and attentive to her not to their dicks and it was fun to watch and participate unlike the scene described above.
  2. 1 point
    Two observations that might bear on the conversation. First, nearly every LS couple of our ken has survived some substantial personal relationship challenge. They have experienced pain, loss, whatever and emerged strong enough to become part of the LS and be happy with. LS couples seem to understand what matters--and what's at stake--more than most vanilla couples we know. Second, once monogamy is no longer used to insulate fidelity, core values are exposed. Occasionally couples find that their values are more divergent --or at least have diverged--in ways that they could not see in the early heady days of romantic love. Such exposure happens in vanilla life as well. It's convenient to blame the LS for the divergence. In reality, the LS merely exposes the divergence differently than experienced in vanilla relationships. Either way, the relationship is either renegotiated, tolerated, or dissolved.
  3. 1 point
    I asked my Uncle who is a big Yankee fan, he said it was Mike Kekich and Fritz Peterson who swapped wives. I just checked, it was the wives who traded husbands, the kids stayed with their mother
  4. 1 point
    Off topic, but some other 60s baseball trivia - who was the only baseball player to have a battery named after him? Al Kaline.
  5. 1 point
    I'm multi orgasmic but I noticed it intensifies with multiple partners, like in an mfm. At most, I can have 10 or more even before my partner reaches his first. More so if 2 partners...until Im sored :-)
  6. 1 point
    I'm not currently a member of any religious organizations but I do find the Christian ethics reasonable. If I'm to believe the Nag Hammadi codices as being related to early Christianity that highly regarded women and believed on the divine feminine, it is not as horrible as many thinks. Apparently there were clerics too who disagreed with the official Church's version prior to the fall of the Roman empire. There were also 'subtleties' not mentioned in mainstream history, like many of the rationalist pioneers of the Renaissance, as well as the earlier phase of the Age of Enlightenment who vehemently opposed the Church's version of Christianity were at the same time freemasons, carrying the symbol of the rose cross. They shared the Christian ethics embodied on those gnostic codices I mentioned. It was only on the later part of the age of enlightenment and the onset of the industrial revolution that those in power adopted empiricism which is a significant departure from the earlier movements. Christianity has always been a contentious issue. Even today there is no standard way of interpretating the Christian teachings. For instance, the North American version is conservative & right leaning, while those in Latin America, Asia, Africa and some in Europe is progressive and left leaning.
  7. 1 point
    My experience has been that as I got older the intensity of my orgasms increased. I liked sex before, but even more so after 50! I was celibate for several years and first discovered this playing with myself. Eventually I had a partner that made me squirt (not pee, I have smelled my sheets and usually go before and after sex.) The eyes rolling back, stars around me, out of body orgasms can happen with single or multiple partners, and on occasion by myself with both oral and PIV. I think it has more to do with how comfortable and relaxed I am in the situation.
  8. 1 point
    For us in our poly family, it was a matter of accretion. Two men, both of whom I love, sharing me; a female friend Clair joining hubby for sex and I discovering my strong Lesbian side with her; Clair getting accidentally pregnant and all of us deciding it was time so I quickly followed; hubby's ex Lora (those two still in love) joining us for sex and ending up staying with the family; us women having more children. For me, I can't say that I love one more than another, but I do love differently, especially between the men and my female family members. If forced to choose, I would stay with Clair and Lora over Red and David. The bond of having children together with the same men, nursing one another's babies, running the household together is incredibly strong. So we love one another differently, but it is love. (We each have a physical relationship with the other, except the two guys.) All I know is that if I had to do it all over again, I'd do it all over again.
  9. 1 point
    Sometime after you cum you come to your senses and the idea of another man having sex with your wife seems less of a good idea.we had a relationship with a friend of ours and the first couple times we fooled around when he was going to have penetrative sex with my wife I would want to call it off. It was because I came already and my mind was clear of sexual desire. After that we decided that it be better to let him penetrate her and finish first. Once we did it a couple times like that I was mentally free of the kink in my brain and by the third time I was totally cool with anything.
  10. 1 point
×
×
  • Create New...