Leaderboard

I’ll give you props for being honest. Some/most people would see those 2 lines as selfish, but like I said, major props for being honest. Wasn’t and not trying to bust your stones, just curious where the crass came from. Different strokes for different folks. See ya on the next thread ??

It's hard (pun not intended) to not stare as a newby. After a while you will one day realize that you haven't been staring. That is when you can complement someone on their appearance, or their tats, or their flat stomach without sounding like a pervert. Welcome to naturism.

Your post was so we'll written. It resinated exactly with the feelings my husband of 35 years and I are having. In October we are planning a trip out of state to a club and can't wait. The excitement of just talking about it has done wonders. He walks around with a hard on and I have wet panties all day.

Thanks Bluespruce. That’s probably the best post on this topic ever and possibly the best post on this or any other board!!! What you’ve said probably covers the thoughts of 98% of women. Even if we’ve got a decent or large cock, we’re aware of someone with a monster Cock and we think, how can mine satisfy after that? I think you’ve definitively answered that question now. Thank you.

I've been with women who had clear cum/breeding fetishes and the orgasm was definitely a reaction to the thought of getting the load. They're the ones who can't help but touch it afterwards or who will masturbate and get off watching you shoot on them. Mrs. E is a little different, it's more a reaction to the anticipation and feeling the cock twitch. We always use condoms with others. Supposing we're doing MFM, she will definitely get off hard on the other M, then keep the low-boil mini orgasms going when I enter her all over again.

When a woman is on hormonal contraceptives, her ovulation cycle is suspended as though she is pregnant. There are nonactive pills in the monthly pack, which doesn't allow ovulation but does result in some breakthrough bleeding, which looks like menstruation. It was originally considered a desirable feature. By not taking the nonactive pills, and just starting the active ones in the next pack, there will almost always be no bleeding like a period at all. BTW, it has been argued that having far fewer periods like this is actually much more like human females were until recently. Historically, girls did not start menstruating until later in their teens because of insufficient calories and physical exhaustion. Once they did become fertile they were almost continuously pregnant or nursing, which also suspends periods.

Forget infidelity; I strongly believe that hubby loves Lora more than he does me. But he treats me as well as he does her, and much better than most men treat their wives. I don't know if he had to choose that he would pick her over me, but you know what? He doesn't have to choose. The issue just doesn't come up, except in my mind.

I'm not currently a member of any religious organizations but I do find the Christian ethics reasonable. If I'm to believe the Nag Hammadi codices as being related to early Christianity that highly regarded women and believed on the divine feminine, it is not as horrible as many thinks. Apparently there were clerics too who disagreed with the official Church's version prior to the fall of the Roman empire. There were also 'subtleties' not mentioned in mainstream history, like many of the rationalist pioneers of the Renaissance, as well as the earlier phase of the Age of Enlightenment who vehemently opposed the Church's version of Christianity were at the same time freemasons, carrying the symbol of the rose cross. They shared the Christian ethics embodied on those gnostic codices I mentioned. It was only on the later part of the age of enlightenment and the onset of the industrial revolution that those in power adopted empiricism which is a significant departure from the earlier movements. Christianity has always been a contentious issue. Even today there is no standard way of interpretating the Christian teachings. For instance, the North American version is conservative & right leaning, while those in Latin America, Asia, Africa and some in Europe is progressive and left leaning.

You wanna call me a bigot for stating scientific fact, have at it. However, I identify as your ruler and savior. You will address me as “The Great One for which you worship”. Because I identify as that, if you do not refer to me in that manner you are a racist and a bigot. Good day to you! Regards, Your ruler and savior

That’s like sexual assault by trickery. Dishonest and deceitful, throw their arse out and then some!

This reminds me of a couple we met through an erotic story website that I was posting on, and so was the wife of that couple. They had never gone further into swinging than the fantasies in their stories. We live in Florida and they in Nevada so I think that distance made them feel safe. During the first few weeks of exchanges online, we let them know that we had full swapped multiple times in the past. And, during those first weeks our email and photo exchanges were vanilla to PG at most. Now this was before Skype but we decided to have a date one evening through emails. We had taken numerous photos that we were sharing and they as well. I had one photo of me getting out of our hot tub with my towel low enough to show about half of my cock. I decided to send it. My wife gasped and said I'd gone to far. The other wife emailed a quick response with only, "OMG". My wife scolded me. Then emails began coming quickly with complete nudes the two of them had taken. That began a two hour exchange that was fun as hell! Yes, we had in the past full swapped with our friends and it was delicious but that night stands out to me as one of my sexiest experiences. This was a couple exploring their boundaries and allowing us to be involved. Oh, and, we had lots more exchanges and more date nights too. They even flew out to visit us. We picked them up at the airport in Orlando and they stayed with us four days. There was no sex during that visit, as previously agreed, but just the atmosphere of sexuality was a real turn-on. The four of us visited Disney, took a trip to Saint Augustine, and even did a state park or two. We stayed in touch for quite a while after that but we did eventually lose contact. The distance was just too great and they probably either lost interest in swinging, however soft, or found folks nearby. So, heck yes, a couple who has full swapped can certainly enjoy a very soft swing couple. I know that I sure did!

Perhaps it is best to give an example as to why. I was in a chat room the other day and a guy (let's just call him steve) kept coming on and asking rude and suggestive things of a lady I was talking with (let's just call her jen). Well steve never got it into his head that when "jen" said something and I responded, he did not need to jump right in. She basically told him to "bug off" but he did not grasp that. We went to a private chat and when we came back, he was gone. We made the agreement that if he came back we would not recognize him as existing. It is that type of a single male that does not consider that it is a unit (man AND woman) that he is talking to that makes it very bad for the rest of us guys. Yes, I have seen single females also ignore the feelings of the wife involved, but somehow it just seems to be more inconsiderate when the guy does it. I have met up with couples that I became friends with, and if other situations in life had not taken me to a part of the country where I could not realistically see them often, it is safe to say we would have perhaps continued to this day our mutual meetings. A note to any single guys reading this. I do believe that if you are considerate of the feelings of the lady and the man in a couple situation at a party or other meeting, the word will get around. A guy needs to be attractive, and that (I think) is more about how he talks with both of the couples, senses what they want and gives that, is honest, caring, sensitive, etc. than what "equipment" or "body shape" he might possess. As was said here, he is entering into the life of a couple, and so he must operate on their ground rules and seek their pleasure way above his. It is all about honesty and no one being pushed into doing something they do not want to! Don't get upset guys, just go along with it and be the very best "third party" to anyone that asks you to play. But first you need to be the best "third person" in a conversation. Don't make a bad first impression, I have done that to often in life, and it is almost impossible for some folks to forget how you came off first!

We have met with many single men and have had a lot of fun with them. Some couples feel they have nothing to bring to the plate, we don't. One thing that bothers me(he) is the single guy who hits on my wife to meet alone when it is all spelled out in our profiles that we only meet as a couple or when we are in a chat room that it is okay for them to come on, and when they figure out it's her chatting, get as crude as possible and also think that everything including meeting, is automatic. We have a habit of wanting to get to know people before we meet them. This really pissies some guys off. The bad ones are few but they pretty much make it tough on the good ones. That's my take on it.

This has always been one of my fantasies. Once we experimented with a favorite toy and my husband penetrating me. I will say it felt pretty awesome, but the old hoo hoo was pretty sore afterwards. I can't figure out though, how you can get two men close enough for actual penetration...I haven't done the splits since high school! LOL For those of you who wonder why I do all the posting...my better half is one of those two-fingered sort of typists and those fingers are better employed elsewhere! Can't you tell I have the summer off and nothing better to do than post!