Leaderboard

"But they've got the most number of users, so if you actually want to get into contact with someone you'd like to meet, SLS is pretty much it, along with SDC and Kasadie." adamgunn Right now yes, but for how long. We haven't recommended SLS for two years. Maybe 6 mos ago we were asked and warned someone away from it. SLS was a great site its numbers grew because people recognized this and the word spread. The reverse is happening now. That they are busy turning the whole thing into a third rate knockoff of other social media sites while ignoring a loyal base. This does not bode well for the future oh SLS.

My Wife and I are both bisexual and desire to have another bisexual couple enjoy each other’s fantasies together. My wife wants a women to sit on her face while take her mans cock and I love to have my wife or his eat my ass right up till he pushes himself in my tight hole. We are really kinky people and wish to find like minded couples

My God, has it really been 7 years since I posted. Funny, but my wife was asking me just this morning if I missed swinging. I said no. Then I get an email from this long ago thread. We gave up swinging years ago due to the difficulty in finding good people. It seemed to always be three were agreeable but the fourth...! Anyway to Covid. I can't imagine swinging in this pandemic. Meeting strangers and getting intimate. Just a flat out NO! Even people we know. I have no idea where they've been and I'm not going to play twenty questions.

Not to mention that any criticism of new practices posted on their forums is immediately pulls down, censoring anyone who dares complain.

We have absolutely zero issue with people trying to make a buck from sex or the lifestyle. Also no problem with updating or improving an outdated website. The issue we have is with changes that do NOT improve the site, rolling out feature That do not function and question if our privacy and security remain as solid as when we signed up. We are never going to download and use an app on our phones for a sex or lifestyle site. Kids use our phones, we share pics with family and coworkers and will not risk someone swiping and finding out our dark secret. However SLS appears to be pushing members from the website to the mobile app and designing features only for the app. If we want to participate in a traditional vanilla social media site ( F—- B—-, I—— G—-, T——-, K—, etc.) I know that what it’s about and know that potentially anything posted can be seen by anyone. That’s not what I signed up for on SLS. Now we are seeing a spike in numbers of people viewing our profile from the mid-Atlantic states. Why? Are they “featuring” our profile outside our region? Don’t know but we opted out of that feature and we have family in that part of the world that we would rather not find us our. Additionally, we are having random people posting to “My Wall” without being a friend or our permission. When ask SLS support to allow an opt out, they said we moved the wall off the main page just ignore those posters because we have no plans to allow an opt out. Come on guys, give me back control of the security features on our profile.this is at the core of the lifestyle is to not kiss and tell and maintain confidentiality.

I'm not going to disagree with you, Forever. Yeah, there's a lot of things I don't care for on SLS. But they've got the most number of users, so if you actually want to get into contact with someone you'd like to meet, SLS is pretty much it, along with SDC and Kasadie.

Since we are part of a closed group of married couples, we don't play with cheaters. But before, when we were doing more open swinging, the only rule I had for my wife was no married men (or women). Not because of the cheating per se, but the danger of an enraged spouse or becoming involved in divorce proceedings. Before my wife and I became exclusive with one another and got married, she had relationships with plenty of married men and a few married women. She preferred it because the relationship was limited by his marriage (married men don't leave their wives), and they were extremely appreciative to be getting what they weren't at home (it wasn't always (or at least just only) sex). But she agrees now it isn't worth it.

Probably, because most of the kind of men you are talking about are only looking to stick their dick in your wife! They will say what they need to to meet that goal. Their fantasy is not being the extra guy for a couple. It is being “THE” guy. We just avoid these kind of men! Doesn’t take long talking to them to figure them out. As for the bi dilemma we just make it a rule to not play with bi men! I am not a homophobe by any measure, but I am 100 percent straight so there is only the need to have other straight men join us when it will be all about her. On her terms of coarse. You can be straight and not have any issues being naked around the same sex! It is called being secure.

Here in the Boston area, it could be mistaken for a Cheetah, a type of cougar perhaps.

For the cost of a lifetime membership we thought it was worthwhile. We've had less luck with finding couples we were interested on SLS, but the one time cost was attractive enough to make it worthwhile. The longer we are members and the more people we meet drives the average cost down. Sites like AFF are an ongoing cost which adds up a lot.

I'm replying as a couple on sls. It's my favorite site. I think it's worth it to have a paid membership. It's much less than we spend on going to clubs, babysitters, sexy underwear, etc! You can have a private gallery, you can send and respond to as many emails and view as many profiles as you want. You can certify people you meet. I think having a paid membership gives you a tiny bit more credibility as person who is serious not just looking for pictures. I find that we get very few contacts. So I contact anyone we're interested in and we do get positive responses on some of those. In your case I wouldn't contact anyone who says no single males, but otherwise you may have better results if you take the initiative rather than waiting to be contacted.