I voted HELL NO, but I would say that if it came up that one of our co-workers (as in PEERS, not superiors or employees) was into the lifestyle - and I mean seriously into the lifestyle, had a very mature outlook, a few years experience, a sense of discretion, and a great marriage - we might consider it. But there's about a 0.001% chance that this would happen. Why? Because one thing we've learned is that people change, and circumstances change. People get promoted/demoted all the time, and somebody ends up working for their swing partner. People develop an inoperable tumour and suddenly they feel they must confess their sins before they die. They "get religious" and they feel they must strike a blow for "righteousness" by outing the people they used to play with. Extreme examples, but you get the idea. There are too many variables.
This is why we don't play with people we a) work with, b) live on the same street with, or c) even in the same TOWN with. Kingston is a much smaller world than you might think. It's population keeps on growing (we even have rush hour traffic now! ), but I've received emails from lots of single young guys wanting to play...then say that they're Queen's students. Uh...no way. Would we swing with someone who worked in a completely unrelated department at Queen's? Maybe...under the right circumstances. Would we swing with one of the students? Not a chance. I totally buy into Murphy's Law; as soon as we had sex with them, we'd find out the student had one or more classes within my department. :rollseyes I'm in a position that has access to students' marks, which suddenly puts me in a very awkward position with my employer. Not to mention legally. So. Student = no play. And I don't care if they SAY they're never taking a class in my department, that student is there a minimum of 4 years. Sorry, but I just don't trust anyone to hold themselves to a promise like that.
See? Way too complicated.